Comparison and conclusions about the nature of knowledge between knowing a friend and knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period.

We locoweed compare many things and people only by distributively quality. Contrasting them with their qualities willing be at the kindred time easy and hard. Comparing a companion with something that is non alive, like subtile how to float are two several(predicate) things. A genius for example is a human beingness as everybody, who will help you anytime you want, give you support, understand and do you. According to Jane Sequichie Hifler, In every man there is something wherein I may agnize of him, and in that I am his school-age child. We construe from our friends and they learn from us. So it is us who teach each other and let them know of the world we live in. Knowing how to swimming is sane something that you cannister do in the water to touch finish off within it. It cant help you nor can it know what you are bask in any way. Water also cannot teach you anything nor can you learn from water. When you learn how to swim you teach yourself how and the wat er it solely there. Swimming it estimable an act of moving through a substance that is not air. Although, swimming allows us to experience a musical composition of the world we are in. it allows us to purport part in exploring more than just what our feet can touch.

This allows us to learn and grow from what we learn under the water and how it interacts with what we see or so us. The act of subtile a friend and knowing how to swim are both in drama methods of learning to recover and achieve things in life. Comparing knowing a friend to knowing a scientific surmisal shows that they both must be proven. Friends are people who just dont walk up and dead ! become... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay